Category Archives: descriptive

Evaluating QBs: The Truth Behind QB Records

*UPDATE: I’ve temporarily changed the blog theme so that the tables in this post will be sortable and searchable.* With the tedious boring stuff out of the way (if you missed the boring parts, here is boring part 1 and … Continue reading

Posted in descriptive, Evaluating QBs Series, Football, offense versus defense, player evaluation, talent distribution, team evaluation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Evaluating QBs: It’s All About Context

In part 1 of my Evaluating QBs series, we looked at what makes teams win and which of those things quarterbacks have control over. While wins can be useful to separate quarterbacks, that is only because they are correlated with … Continue reading

Posted in descriptive, Evaluating QBs Series, Football, offense versus defense, player evaluation, talent distribution, team evaluation | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Evaluating QBs: Why Not Wins?

Full disclosure: I’m a Peyton Manning fan. If you can’t get past that, stop reading now. Still there? Good, welcome. Following the Broncos recent loss to the Ravens (and the subsequent Patriots loss), there has been a new wave of … Continue reading

Posted in descriptive, Evaluating QBs Series, Football, offense versus defense, player evaluation, predictive, talent distribution, team evaluation | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Achievement S-Curve: 3/10/2012

About half of the automatic bids are still up for grabs this weekend, but the NCAA Tournament picture is starting to take shape. It’s time for one last Achievement S-Curve update. As always, the full ratings can be found here. … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, March Madness, team evaluation | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Blindness of the Blind Resume

I love the spirit of the blind resume. I hate the execution. With Selection Sunday just hours away, you will undoubtedly be inundated with blind resumes comparing multiple teams and asked to decide which team is in and which is … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, March Madness, team evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What the RPI is and what it is not

Earlier today on CBSsports.com, Matt Norlander wrote an article about the much-maligned RPI. He comes to this conclusion: If anything else, this chart proves there are far too frequent communication breakdowns with teams across the board, enough so that the … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, March Madness, predictive, review, team evaluation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Selection Question Revisited

The Philadelphia Eagles finished the season 8-8, but outscored their opponents by 68 points, the 5th-best mark in the NFC. Seven of their 8 losses were by one score or less, and they finished the season hot on a 4-game … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, Football, March Madness, team evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Achievement S-Curve: 2/13/2012

Quick update on the Achievement S-Curve. First, the bracket and the full ASC data here: The ASC is converging with Bracketology. Besides differences in doling out the automatic bids, just two of Lunardi’s at-large teams were not in my bracket–BYU … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, March Madness, predictive, team evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who’s REALLY Going Dancing?

Around this time of year, there’s lots of talk about who’s in and who’s out and who’s on the bubble. Plenty of chatter about what may or may not get your team into the Big Dance. Tons of discussion of … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, March Madness, predictive, simulation, team evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Achievement S-Curve: 1/30/2012

Those following along (those that have not, start here, here, and here) know that the goal of the Achievement S-Curve is to reward teams for what they have accomplished on the court. Wins and losses count. Strength of schedule counts. … Continue reading

Posted in College Basketball, descriptive, March Madness, predictive, team evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment